downloadtrio.blogg.se - Definition of omnipresence

#DEFINITION OF OMNIPRESENCE FULL#

Omnipresence is altogether different because it means that the fullness of God is present everywhere. Instead, there are gas molecules throughout the room.

#DEFINITION OF OMNIPRESENCE FULL#

When we think about oxygen in a room, the full quantity of oxygen is not gathered at one point in the corner. Moreover, when a gas is diffused throughout a particular area, no one space contains every gas molecule. In the first place, gases have material form even if they are often invisible to us, and God is immaterial. It would be a mistake, for example, to conceive of omnipresence as God's being like a gas that is diffused throughout the entire universe. Like divine infinity, however, divine omnipresence is a difficult concept to grasp. He transcends spatial limitations, and He is able to be in many places-indeed, everywhere-all at once. He is not limited to only one place, so we cannot erect a barrier between ourselves and His presence. No matter where we go, there our God will be.

There is no place that we can hide in all creation because God fills all creation. Today's passage is one of many texts in Scripture that reveal to us our Creator's omnipresence. If God cannot be confined in any finite space, it makes sense that He would be omnipresent, that is, present everywhere in creation. The fact that our Lord has no spatial limitations has certain consequences for how we understand His other attributes, with omnipresence being a logical counterpart to His infinity.

The Podcast - Episode 3: A Semantic Attack on Divi.As a being who is beyond measure, God cannot be contained in any finite space (Ps.

Surveillance and Moral Character: Kantian and Hobb.

Enoch on The Epistemological Challenge to Metanorm.

Again, not really relevant here, but I think it's an overlooked point on omnipotence that is actually very important in handling the Problem of Evil, the Cosmological Argument, and more. In the wake of the Multiple Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, I'd think that it would make much more sense to talk about God doing things across multiple worlds - perhaps doing them differently in different worlds. I'd note one more strange thing about omnipotence, which does not really matter here but comes to bear elsewhere - for some reason people keep assuming god can only make one universe.

It doesn't seem, from your report, like Everitt did a thorough survey or systematic analysis.

god can determine that excessive evil will be in the world, but does not because he is Good - now try to make sense of that without filling your head with a spaghetti of thought.)Īre there other a-priori reasonable definitions of omnipotence? I don't have one on hand, but I'd tend to think so. I believe Def6 handles the raised problems fairly well, although some questionable aspects remain (e.g. Note the important different between X being able to do something, which is an action in time, and determining reality, which is not an action in time. What about an Eternal deity, for example?ĭef 6(?): "X is omnipotent" = "X can determine the eternal physical reality in any way that is not self-contradicting". I'm not sure it covers all options of defining omnipotence, though.